STAND. COM. REP. NO. 2998

 

Honolulu, Hawaii

 

RE: S.B. No. 2543

S.D. 2

 

 

 

Honorable Ronald D. Kouchi

President of the Senate

Thirtieth State Legislature

Regular Session of 2020

State of Hawaii

 

Sir:

 

Your Committees on Commerce, Consumer Protection, and Health and Judiciary, to which was referred S.B. No. 2543, S.D. 1, entitled:

 

"A BILL FOR AN ACT RELATING TO MEDICAL CANNABIS,"

 

beg leave to report as follows:

 

The purpose and intent of this measure is to:

 

(1) Prohibit an employer from discriminating against a person in hiring, termination, or condition of employment based on the person's status as a medical cannabis cardholder, under certain conditions; and

 

(2) Specify that an employer may use a fit for duty test as a tool for medical cannabis users in potentially dangerous occupations.

 

Your Committees received testimony in support of this measure from the Hawaii Cannabis Industry Association; Aloha Green Holdings Inc.; Community Alliance on Prisons; American Academy of Pediatrics, Hawaii Chapter; LGBT Caucus of the Democratic Party of Hawaii; Kush Hawaii; The Drug Policy Forum of Hawaii; and four individuals. Your Committees received testimony in opposition to this measure from the Department of Public Safety; Department of Human Resources of the City and County of Honolulu; Maui Police Department; Honolulu Police Department; Honolulu Emergency Services Department; Hawaii Food Industry Association; Hawaiian Electric Company, Inc.; Matson; Maui Chamber of Commerce; and Building Industry Association of Hawaii. Your Committees received comments on this measure from the Department of the Attorney General, Hawaii Civil Rights Commission, Akamai Cannabis Clinic, and Chamber of Commerce Hawaii.

 

Your Committees find that several states have given people suffering from illness and disability access to medical cannabis. However, some medical cannabis users risk their jobs if they use it, even if that use is off-site and does not affect the workplace. The conflict between state and federal medical cannabis laws causes confusion for employers, who are unsure whether state medical cannabis laws supersede their power to enforce drug-free workplace policies against employees. Therefore, this measure clearly addresses the scope of accommodation that employers must provide to medical cannabis users.

 

Your Committees have amended this measure by:

 

(1) Inserting language that exempts various categories of employment from the protections of this measure that prohibit an employer from discriminating against a person in hiring, termination, or condition of employment based on the person's status as a medical cannabis cardholder;

 

(2) Inserting an effective date of January 2, 2050, to encourage further discussion; and

 

(3) Making technical, nonsubstantive amendments for the purposes of clarity and consistency.

 

As affirmed by the records of votes of the members of your Committees on Commerce, Consumer Protection, and Health and Judiciary that are attached to this report, your Committees are in accord with the intent and purpose of S.B. No. 2543, S.D. 1, as amended herein, and recommend that it pass Third Reading in the form attached hereto as S.B. No. 2543, S.D. 2.


 

Respectfully submitted on behalf of the members of the Committees on Commerce, Consumer Protection, and Health and Judiciary,

 

________________________________

KARL RHOADS, Chair

 

________________________________

ROSALYN H. BAKER, Chair