Honolulu, Hawaii


RE: S.B. No. 2089




Honorable Shan S. Tsutsui

President of the Senate

Twenty-Sixth State Legislature

Regular Session of 2012

State of Hawaii




Your Committee on Tourism, to which was referred S.B. No. 2089 entitled:




begs leave to report as follows:


The purpose and intent of this measure is to require:


(1) Any nonresident owner who operates a transient accommodation located in the nonresident owner's private residence, including an apartment, unit, or townhouse, to employ a property manager approved by the Real Estate Commission;


(2) The nonresident owner to furnish the name, address, and contact information of the property manager to any association of homeowners, community association, condominium association, cooperative, or any other nongovernmental entity with covenants, bylaws, and administrative provisions with which the owner's compliance is required; and


(3) Any property manager authorized under an agreement by the nonresident owner to collect rent on behalf of the nonresident owner to comply with general excise tax and transient accommodations tax requirements.


Your Committee received testimony in support of this measure from the Department of Taxation; Department of Planning and Permitting, County of Honolulu; Exclusive Gateways; Whalers Realty Management Company, Inc.; Kauai Exclusive Management; Resortica Hawaii; Save Oahu's Neighborhoods; and one individual. Your Committee received testimony in opposition to this measure from the Hawaii Association of REALTORS, Hawaii Vacation Rental Owners Association, and eleven individuals. Your Committee received comments on this measure from the Hawaii Tourism Authority and the Real Estate Commission.


Your Committee finds that with the advent of the Internet, there has been a significant increase of rental-by-owner activities occurring outside the State through internet bookings. These nonresident owners may or may not charge general excise and transient accommodations taxes on their reservations, and even if they do, they may not remit the taxes to the State. Since the transactions take place outside of Hawaii, it is difficult to determine how many violations occur and the resulting revenue loss to the State.


Your Committee understands that the lack of information hampers compliance efforts by the Department of Taxation, but points out that the problem is not a new one, and greater efforts must be made by the Department. Your Committee notes that the Hawaii Tourism Authority published a study in 2005 on the scope of the problem estimating 9,000 units in noncompliance at the time and that this information was shared with the Department.


Your Committee also finds that in addition to the tax ramifications addressed in this measure, nonresident owners who do not employ a Hawaii-based property manager leave their guests vulnerable in the case of emergencies or natural disasters, such as the tsunami alert in 2011, when absent owners do not provide appropriate and easily accessible emergency information. While this concern is not addressed in this measure, it further stresses the need for a Hawaii-based property manager.


As affirmed by the record of votes of the members of your Committee on Tourism that is attached to this report, your Committee is in accord with the intent and purpose of S.B. No. 2089 and recommends that it pass Second Reading and be referred to the Committee on Commerce and Consumer Protection.


Respectfully submitted on behalf of the members of the Committee on Tourism,