STAND. COM. REP. NO. 517

 

Honolulu, Hawaii

                  

 

RE:    S.B. No. 35

 

 

 

Honorable Shan S. Tsutsui

President of the Senate

Twenty-Sixth State Legislature

Regular Session of 2011

State of Hawaii

 

Sir:

 

     Your Committee on Commerce and Consumer Protection, to which was referred S.B. No. 35 entitled:

 

"A BILL FOR AN ACT RELATING TO THE MOTOR VEHICLE INDUSTRY LICENSING ACT,"

 

begs leave to report as follows:

 

     The purpose and intent of this measure is to:

 

     (1)  Clarify that the same procedures, protections, rights, and remedies provided to auto dealers under Act 164, Session Laws of Hawaii 2010, also apply to distributors that are not manufacturers; and

 

     (2)  Delete a definition of "good faith" that is no longer necessary, as it is not used in the paragraph in which it was intended to apply.

 

     Your Committee received testimony in support of this measure from the Department of Commerce and Consumer Affairs; Motor Vehicle Industry Licensing Board; Hawaii Automobile Dealers' Association; and Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers.

 

     The intent of your Committee is to extend the rights and protections that are provided to licensed automotive dealers to licensed automotive distributors.  According to testimony of the Department of Commerce and Consumer Affairs, this measure reconciles existing language with part II of chapter 437, Hawaii Revised Statutes, relating to the Motor Vehicle Industry Licensing Act, which was enacted by Act 164, Session Laws of Hawaii 2010.  Act 164 established certain rights and duties among motor vehicle dealers, distributors, and manufacturers and originally intended to apply certain provisions to distributors, but those provisions were mistakenly omitted from the final Act.  This measure applies those provisions to distributors, as originally intended by Act 164.

 

     As affirmed by the record of votes of the members of your Committee on Commerce and Consumer Protection that is attached to this report, your Committee is in accord with the intent and purpose of S.B. No. 35 and recommends that it pass Third Reading.

 

Respectfully submitted on behalf of the members of the Committee on Commerce and Consumer Protection,

 

 

 

____________________________

ROSALYN H. BAKER, Chair