THE SENATE

S.B. NO.

494

TWENTY-EIGHTH LEGISLATURE, 2015

 

STATE OF HAWAII

 

 

 

 

 

 

A BILL FOR AN ACT

 

 

relating to child visitation.

 

 

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF HAWAII:

 


     SECTION 1.  The legislature finds that there is immense ethnic and cultural diversity in the State and there should be an option to honor cultural practices associated with caregiving.  Many people throughout the State have hanai relationships in which caregivers who have no biological relationship with a child undertake duties of a parental nature.  These caregivers may have substantial relationships with children that warrant preservation.  Children also have the right to maintain strong bonds with caregivers with whom they have created a special, parent-like bond.  In Leong v. Takasaki, the Hawaii supreme court recognized hanai relationships and acknowledged that the hanai system remains a strong custom in the State.

     The purpose of this Act is to provide primary caregivers with child visitation rights under certain circumstances.

     SECTION 2.  Chapter 571, Hawaii Revised Statutes, is amended by adding a new section to be appropriately designated and to read as follows:

     "§571-    Primary caregivers' visitation rights; petition; notice; order.  (a)  A primary caregiver of a minor child may file a petition with the court for an order of reasonable visitation rights.

     (b)  The court may award reasonable visitation rights; provided that the following criteria are met:

     (1)  This State is the home state of the child at the time of the commencement of the proceeding;

     (2)  Denial of reasonable visitation rights would cause harm to the child; and

     (3)  The petitioner demonstrates that the person has been the child's primary caregiver for a period of not less than six consecutive months during the eighteen-month period immediately preceding the filing of the petition.

     For purposes of this section, "primary caregiver" means a relationship between a caregiver and a nonbiological child where the caregiver cares for the child, regardless of whether the child has been formally adopted by the caregiver under Hawaii law.

     (c)  In any proceeding on a petition filed under this section, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the parent's decision regarding visitation is in the best interests of the child.  The presumption may be rebutted by evidence that denial of reasonable visitation rights would cause harm to the child.

     (d)  In ruling on a petition filed under this section, the court may consider factors including the following:

     (1)  The nature and extent of any pre-existing relationship between the child and the petitioner;

     (2)  Whether the petitioner has previously been granted visitation by the child's parent or custodian and, if so, the nature and extent of the visitation;

     (3)  Whether the petitioner has previously been awarded visitation rights or custody of the child by a court;

     (4)  Whether the child has resided with the petitioner, either alone or with a parent and, if so, how recently and for how long;

     (5)  Whether the petitioner has provided financial support to the child, including the provision of food; clothing; education; and medical, dental, or mental health care;

     (6)  If the parent or custodian has denied the petitioner visitation or has otherwise substantially restricted visitation that had been previously granted, whether the reason given, if any, bears on the petitioner's ability to safely care for the child during visitation or relates to an issue between the parent or custodian and the petitioner; and

     (7)  Any relevant factor under section 587A-7.

     (e)  No hearing for an order of reasonable visitation rights under this section shall be held unless each of the living parents and the child's custodians shall have received due notice, actual or constructive, of the allegations of the petition and of the time and place of the hearing thereof.

     (f)  The court may place reasonable restrictions, including time limitations, on visitation granted under this section.

     (g)  An order made pursuant to this section shall be enforceable by the court, and the court may issue other orders to carry out these enforcement powers if in the best interests of the child."

     SECTION 3.  New statutory material is underscored.

     SECTION 4.  This Act shall take effect upon its approval.

 

INTRODUCED BY:

_____________________________

 

 


 


 

Report Title:

Child Visitation; Primary Caregiver Visitation

 

Description:

Permits family courts to award reasonable visitation to primary caregivers under certain circumstances, regardless of whether the child has been formally adopted by the caregiver under Hawaii law.  Establishes presumption that a parent's decision regarding visitation is in the best interests of the child, which may be rebutted by evidence that denial would cause harm to the child.  Identifies factors a court may consider in awarding visitation.  Grants the court discretion to place reasonable restrictions, including time limitations, on visitation.

 

 

 

The summary description of legislation appearing on this page is for informational purposes only and is not legislation or evidence of legislative intent.